AI Compliance Gap Analyser for US

US-specific obligations covered

The output is anchored on the regulations that apply to AI deployments in US. The top frameworks cited:

• Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act (SB 24-205, codified at C.R.S. §§ 6-1-1701 to 6-1-1707)state_legislation · Enacted - not yet in force

  Deployers of high-risk AI systems must conduct impact assessments, implement AI risk management programmes, provide consumers with clear disclosure of AI use and adverse action explanations, and notify developers of discovered risks.

• Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (HB 149)state_legislation · In force

  AI developers and deployers must avoid prohibited uses, provide clear disclosures when consumers interact with AI in consequential contexts, conduct algorithmic-discrimination assessments for in-scope systems, and report adverse incidents to the Texas Attorney General. Compliance with NIST AI RMF and recognised standards is treated as a rebuttable presumption of reasonable care.

• California Consumer Privacy Act / California Privacy Rights Act (CCPA/CPRA)state_legislation · In force

  Businesses must disclose automated decision-making logic upon consumer request, allow opt-out of profiling for targeted advertising or significant decisions, and conduct and document risk assessments for high-risk data processing activities.

• California Bot Disclosure Law (SB 1001 — Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§17940-17943)state_legislation · In force

  Operators of bots that interact with California consumers in commercial or electoral contexts must clearly and conspicuously disclose that the consumer is communicating with a bot, with the disclosure designed to inform a reasonable person communicating with the bot. Disclosure must not be hidden behind interaction or buried in a privacy notice.

How the AI Compliance Gap Analyser approaches this

You describe your organisation, choose your framework (EU AI Act / NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 / all three), and answer a brief 10-question self-assessment per framework. The tool maps your stated posture against each framework requirement to produce a structured, evidence-based gap analysis ready for your compliance, legal, and governance practitioners.

The Executive Summary Word document is a one-page sign-off artifact — overall scorecard, top 5 priority actions, cross-framework synthesis (when comparing all three), sign-off block. The detailed Excel workbook is the working remediation instrument: per-framework gap sheets with current state, target state, gap severity, priority action, framework citations, owner, effort, and a Status dropdown that drives the live Dashboard. Both are AI-assisted drafting aids intended to accelerate review and remediation by qualified practitioners.

What you get

• ✓ Two artefacts, two jobs: Executive Summary (.docx) for board sign-off, Detailed Workbook (.xlsx) for the working remediation tracking — no overlap, no confusion.
• ✓ Customer self-assessment driven: gap ratings come from your stated posture, not from inferred maturity. The workbook pre-fills your answer alongside each requirement so reviewers see the basis for every gap rating.
• ✓ Live dashboard with formulas + native radar + doughnut charts that auto-refresh as you mark gap rows Done — no regeneration needed to see remediation progress.
• ✓ Tailored to your jurisdiction, industry, organisation size, and risk appetite — every gap rating accounts for your context, not a generic checklist. Designed for review and sign-off by qualified compliance, legal, or governance practitioners.

Ready to generate?

$39 · one-time — answer a 6-question intake (including jurisdiction = US), and download your tailored document immediately.

Also available framed for your sector → see industry-specific pages