🇺🇸 United States · AI Compliance Gap Analyser
A two-artifact deliverable: an Executive Summary Word document for sign-off (compliance scorecard, top 5 priority actions, cross-framework synthesis where applicable, sign-off block), plus a multi-sheet Excel workbook with per-framework gap tables, prioritised action plan, 10-domain compliance heat map, 3-phase implementation timeline, jurisdiction-specific regulatory deadlines, and a live Dashboard with native radar + doughnut charts that auto-refresh as you mark gaps Done. Aligned to your selected framework — EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, or all three.
The output is anchored on the regulations that apply to AI deployments in US. The top frameworks cited:
Developers of covered ADMT must give deployers technical documentation (intended uses, categories of training data, known limitations, usage instructions); deployers must notify individuals before ADMT use in a consequential decision and disclose an adverse outcome within 30 days; consumers may request data correction and meaningful human review. Core obligations begin 1 January 2027.
AI developers and deployers must avoid prohibited uses, provide clear disclosures when consumers interact with AI in consequential contexts, conduct algorithmic-discrimination assessments for in-scope systems, and report adverse incidents to the Texas Attorney General. Compliance with NIST AI RMF and recognised standards is treated as a rebuttable presumption of reasonable care.
Businesses must disclose automated decision-making logic upon consumer request, allow opt-out of profiling for targeted advertising or significant decisions, and conduct and document risk assessments for high-risk data processing activities.
Operators of bots that interact with California consumers in commercial or electoral contexts must clearly and conspicuously disclose that the consumer is communicating with a bot, with the disclosure designed to inform a reasonable person communicating with the bot. Disclosure must not be hidden behind interaction or buried in a privacy notice.
You describe your organisation, choose your framework (EU AI Act / NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 / all three), and answer a brief 10-question self-assessment per framework. The tool maps your stated posture against each framework requirement to produce a structured, evidence-based gap analysis ready for your compliance, legal, and governance practitioners.
The Executive Summary Word document is a one-page sign-off artifact — overall scorecard, top 5 priority actions, cross-framework synthesis (when comparing all three), sign-off block. The detailed Excel workbook is the working remediation instrument: per-framework gap sheets with current state, target state, gap severity, priority action, framework citations, owner, effort, and a Status dropdown that drives the live Dashboard. Both are AI-assisted drafting aids intended to accelerate review and remediation by qualified practitioners.
$39 · one-time — answer a 6-question intake (including jurisdiction = US), and download your tailored document immediately.
Analyse Gaps →Also available framed for your sector → see industry-specific pages