AI Compliance Gap Analyser for UK

UK-specific obligations covered

The output is anchored on the regulations that apply to AI deployments in UK. The top frameworks cited:

• UK General Data Protection Regulationlegislation · In force

  Process personal data lawfully, fairly, and transparently per Art. 5; establish a lawful basis under Art. 6; provide subject-rights mechanisms (access, rectification, erasure, portability, automated-decision objection); report personal data breaches to the ICO within 72 hours of awareness; conduct a Data Protection Impact Assessment for high-risk processing including automated decision-making with significant effects.

• UK Data Protection Act 2018legislation · In force

  For law-enforcement processing: comply with Part 3 (six data-protection principles, lawful basis under s.35, automated-decision safeguards under s.49-50, breach notification). For special-category or criminal-offence data processing: meet a Schedule 1 condition (the lawful-basis requirement under UK GDPR Art. 9/10 alone is insufficient). For intelligence services: Part 4 framework. ICO has investigatory powers under Part 5 + monetary-penalty powers under Part 6 (up to £17.5m or 4% of global turnover).

• Online Safety Act 2023legislation · In force

  In-scope services must conduct risk assessments, implement proportionate safety measures for illegal and harmful content including AI-generated material, and comply with Ofcom codes of practice on algorithmic content distribution.

• UK Pro-Innovation AI Regulatory Framework (2023 White Paper)policy_framework · In force

  Regulated sector organisations must consider and embed five AI principles — safety and security, transparency and explainability, fairness, accountability and governance, and contestability and redress — as implemented by their sectoral regulator.

How the AI Compliance Gap Analyser approaches this

You describe your organisation, choose your framework (EU AI Act / NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 / all three), and answer a brief 10-question self-assessment per framework. The tool maps your stated posture against each framework requirement to produce a structured, evidence-based gap analysis ready for your compliance, legal, and governance practitioners.

The Executive Summary Word document is a one-page sign-off artifact — overall scorecard, top 5 priority actions, cross-framework synthesis (when comparing all three), sign-off block. The detailed Excel workbook is the working remediation instrument: per-framework gap sheets with current state, target state, gap severity, priority action, framework citations, owner, effort, and a Status dropdown that drives the live Dashboard. Both are AI-assisted drafting aids intended to accelerate review and remediation by qualified practitioners.

What you get

• ✓ Two artefacts, two jobs: Executive Summary (.docx) for board sign-off, Detailed Workbook (.xlsx) for the working remediation tracking — no overlap, no confusion.
• ✓ Customer self-assessment driven: gap ratings come from your stated posture, not from inferred maturity. The workbook pre-fills your answer alongside each requirement so reviewers see the basis for every gap rating.
• ✓ Live dashboard with formulas + native radar + doughnut charts that auto-refresh as you mark gap rows Done — no regeneration needed to see remediation progress.
• ✓ Tailored to your jurisdiction, industry, organisation size, and risk appetite — every gap rating accounts for your context, not a generic checklist. Designed for review and sign-off by qualified compliance, legal, or governance practitioners.

Ready to generate?

$39 · one-time — answer a 6-question intake (including jurisdiction = UK), and download your tailored document immediately.

Also available framed for your sector → see industry-specific pages