🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates · AI Vendor Assessment

AI Vendor Assessment for UAE

A three-artifact deliverable: an Executive Summary Word document for sign-off (recommendation, top risk flags, top strengths, sign-off block), a 30-question scored Excel workbook with auto-summing category totals and an Evidence Request List tab, and a companion Procurement Checklist with foundational readiness items. Aligned to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A or the NIST AI Risk Management Framework — your choice at form time.

UAE-specific obligations covered

The output is anchored on the regulations that apply to AI deployments in UAE. The top frameworks cited:

  • UAE Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on Personal Data Protectionfederal_law · In force

    Data controllers must establish a lawful basis for processing, implement a written data protection policy, appoint a Data Protection Officer, comply with cross-border transfer restrictions, and notify the UAE Data Office and individuals of significant personal data breaches.

  • UAE National AI Strategy 2031national_strategy · In force

    UAE government entities and strategic sector operators must develop AI adoption plans aligned with the national strategy, embed UAE AI ethics principles into AI deployments, and contribute to national AI safety and governance initiatives.

  • ADGM Data Protection Regulations 2021free_zone_regulation · In force

    ADGM-registered entities must process personal data lawfully, conduct Data Protection Impact Assessments for high-risk AI processing, implement privacy by design, and report personal data breaches to the ADGM Registration Authority within 72 hours.

  • DIFC Data Protection Law No. 5 of 2020free_zone_law · In force

    DIFC entities operating AI systems that process personal data must appoint a Data Protection Officer where required, conduct DPIAs before deploying high-risk AI, and report personal data breaches to the Commissioner of Data Protection within 72 hours.

How the AI Vendor Assessment approaches this

You describe the vendor (name and product or service) and your organisation's context — jurisdiction, industry, staff size, risk appetite — and choose your alignment framework: ISO/IEC 42001:2023, NIST AI RMF, or both. The tool produces a structured, evidence-based assessment ready to hand to your procurement, legal, and information-security teams.

The Executive Summary Word document is a one-page sign-off artifact — recommendation (Approved / Conditional / Rejected), top three risk flags, top three strengths, sign-off block. The detailed Excel workbook is the working assessment instrument: 30 questions across six weighted categories, with evidence guidance, regulatory call-outs, and an auto-summing scoring sheet. Both are AI-assisted drafting aids intended to accelerate review by qualified practitioners.

What you get

  • Four deliverables, three jobs: Executive Summary (.docx) for board sign-off, Detailed Workbook (.xlsx) for the working scoring (with the Evidence Request List on a dedicated tab inside it), Procurement Checklist (.xlsx) for foundational readiness — no overlap, no confusion.
  • Aligned to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A or NIST AI Risk Management Framework — your choice. Every question carries the framework reference and (where applicable) jurisdiction-critical regulatory call-outs.
  • Excel formulas auto-sum each category total, calculate the weighted overall percentage, and surface Pass / Conditional / Reject thresholds — procurement teams don't have to re-key or re-calculate.
  • Tailored to the vendor's product category, your industry, jurisdiction, and organisation size — not a generic checklist. Designed for review and sign-off by qualified procurement, legal, or information-security practitioners.

Ready to generate?

$29 · one-time — answer a 6-question intake (including jurisdiction = UAE), and download your tailored document immediately.

Assess Vendor

Also available framed for your sector → see industry-specific pages

AI-assisted drafting aid. The output references UAE regulation but is not legal advice. Have a qualified legal, compliance, or regulatory professional review before implementation.