AI Vendor Assessment for JP

JP-specific obligations covered

The output is anchored on the regulations that apply to AI deployments in JP. The top frameworks cited:

• Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI, 2022 Amendment)national_law · In force

  Business operators must identify the purpose of personal information use, obtain opt-in consent for third-party disclosure of sensitive personal information, implement security management measures, and notify the PPC of data breaches affecting 1,000 or more individuals.

• Guidelines for AI Development and Utilization (Cabinet Office, 2024)government_guidelines · In force

  AI developers and service providers should implement governance mechanisms aligned with the ten principles, conduct proportionate risk assessments for AI applications, and maintain transparency about AI system capabilities, limitations, and decision-making processes.

• Act on Promotion of Research and Development and Utilization of Artificial Intelligence-Related Technologies (2025)national_law · In force

  The national government must formulate and regularly update a basic AI promotion plan, and business operators developing or deploying AI should cooperate with government safety measures and implement appropriate AI governance practices.

• Amended Telecommunications Business Act — Platform Transparencynational_law · In force

  Large-scale platform operators meeting service scale thresholds must disclose their algorithmic content curation policies to users, report annually on information distribution diversity measures, and provide users with mechanisms to control algorithmic recommendations.

How the AI Vendor Assessment approaches this

You describe the vendor (name and product or service) and your organisation's context — jurisdiction, industry, staff size, risk appetite — and choose your alignment framework: ISO/IEC 42001:2023, NIST AI RMF, or both. The tool produces a structured, evidence-based assessment ready to hand to your procurement, legal, and information-security teams.

The Executive Summary Word document is a one-page sign-off artifact — recommendation (Approved / Conditional / Rejected), top three risk flags, top three strengths, sign-off block. The detailed Excel workbook is the working assessment instrument: 30 questions across six weighted categories, with evidence guidance, regulatory call-outs, and an auto-summing scoring sheet. Both are AI-assisted drafting aids intended to accelerate review by qualified practitioners.

What you get

• ✓ Four deliverables, three jobs: Executive Summary (.docx) for board sign-off, Detailed Workbook (.xlsx) for the working scoring (with the Evidence Request List on a dedicated tab inside it), Procurement Checklist (.xlsx) for foundational readiness — no overlap, no confusion.
• ✓ Aligned to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A or NIST AI Risk Management Framework — your choice. Every question carries the framework reference and (where applicable) jurisdiction-critical regulatory call-outs.
• ✓ Excel formulas auto-sum each category total, calculate the weighted overall percentage, and surface Pass / Conditional / Reject thresholds — procurement teams don't have to re-key or re-calculate.
• ✓ Tailored to the vendor's product category, your industry, jurisdiction, and organisation size — not a generic checklist. Designed for review and sign-off by qualified procurement, legal, or information-security practitioners.

Ready to generate?

$29 · one-time — answer a 6-question intake (including jurisdiction = JP), and download your tailored document immediately.

Also available framed for your sector → see industry-specific pages