AI Compliance Gap Analyser for JP

JP-specific obligations covered

The output is anchored on the regulations that apply to AI deployments in JP. The top frameworks cited:

• Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI, 2022 Amendment)national_law · In force

  Business operators must identify the purpose of personal information use, obtain opt-in consent for third-party disclosure of sensitive personal information, implement security management measures, and notify the PPC of data breaches affecting 1,000 or more individuals.

• Guidelines for AI Development and Utilization (Cabinet Office, 2024)government_guidelines · In force

  AI developers and service providers should implement governance mechanisms aligned with the ten principles, conduct proportionate risk assessments for AI applications, and maintain transparency about AI system capabilities, limitations, and decision-making processes.

• Act on Promotion of Research and Development and Utilization of Artificial Intelligence-Related Technologies (2025)national_law · In force

  The national government must formulate and regularly update a basic AI promotion plan, and business operators developing or deploying AI should cooperate with government safety measures and implement appropriate AI governance practices.

• Amended Telecommunications Business Act — Platform Transparencynational_law · In force

  Large-scale platform operators meeting service scale thresholds must disclose their algorithmic content curation policies to users, report annually on information distribution diversity measures, and provide users with mechanisms to control algorithmic recommendations.

How the AI Compliance Gap Analyser approaches this

You describe your organisation, choose your framework (EU AI Act / NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 / all three), and answer a brief 10-question self-assessment per framework. The tool maps your stated posture against each framework requirement to produce a structured, evidence-based gap analysis ready for your compliance, legal, and governance practitioners.

The Executive Summary Word document is a one-page sign-off artifact — overall scorecard, top 5 priority actions, cross-framework synthesis (when comparing all three), sign-off block. The detailed Excel workbook is the working remediation instrument: per-framework gap sheets with current state, target state, gap severity, priority action, framework citations, owner, effort, and a Status dropdown that drives the live Dashboard. Both are AI-assisted drafting aids intended to accelerate review and remediation by qualified practitioners.

What you get

• ✓ Two artefacts, two jobs: Executive Summary (.docx) for board sign-off, Detailed Workbook (.xlsx) for the working remediation tracking — no overlap, no confusion.
• ✓ Customer self-assessment driven: gap ratings come from your stated posture, not from inferred maturity. The workbook pre-fills your answer alongside each requirement so reviewers see the basis for every gap rating.
• ✓ Live dashboard with formulas + native radar + doughnut charts that auto-refresh as you mark gap rows Done — no regeneration needed to see remediation progress.
• ✓ Tailored to your jurisdiction, industry, organisation size, and risk appetite — every gap rating accounts for your context, not a generic checklist. Designed for review and sign-off by qualified compliance, legal, or governance practitioners.

Ready to generate?

$39 · one-time — answer a 6-question intake (including jurisdiction = JP), and download your tailored document immediately.

Also available framed for your sector → see industry-specific pages