AI Compliance Gap Analyser for INTL

INTL-specific obligations covered

The output is anchored on the regulations that apply to AI deployments in INTL. The top frameworks cited:

• OECD Recommendation of the Council on AI (OECD AI Principles, 2024 update)international_framework · Voluntary

  Adherent countries and their organisations are expected to implement five value-based AI principles — inclusive growth, human rights, transparency, robustness and safety, and accountability — and to report on implementation through the OECD AI Policy Observatory.

• UN General Assembly Resolution — Seizing the Opportunities of Safe, Secure and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence Systems for Sustainable Development (A/RES/78/265, 21 March 2024)international_resolution · Adopted

  UN member states are encouraged to develop national AI governance frameworks, engage in international cooperation on AI safety and interoperability of governance standards, and ensure AI systems are developed in a manner consistent with international human rights law.

• Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI and Human Rights (CETS No. 225, 2024)international_treaty · Open for ratification

  State parties must implement legislative or other measures to ensure AI system activities respect human rights, establish oversight and remedy mechanisms for AI-related harms, and prohibit or restrict AI activities incompatible with democracy or the rule of law.

• ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS)international_standard · Published

  Organisations implementing ISO 42001 must establish AI governance policies and objectives, define organisational roles for AI accountability, conduct AI impact and risk assessments, and implement operational controls to address AI risks across the full AI system lifecycle.

How the AI Compliance Gap Analyser approaches this

You describe your organisation, choose your framework (EU AI Act / NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 / all three), and answer a brief 10-question self-assessment per framework. The tool maps your stated posture against each framework requirement to produce a structured, evidence-based gap analysis ready for your compliance, legal, and governance practitioners.

The Executive Summary Word document is a one-page sign-off artifact — overall scorecard, top 5 priority actions, cross-framework synthesis (when comparing all three), sign-off block. The detailed Excel workbook is the working remediation instrument: per-framework gap sheets with current state, target state, gap severity, priority action, framework citations, owner, effort, and a Status dropdown that drives the live Dashboard. Both are AI-assisted drafting aids intended to accelerate review and remediation by qualified practitioners.

What you get

• ✓ Two artefacts, two jobs: Executive Summary (.docx) for board sign-off, Detailed Workbook (.xlsx) for the working remediation tracking — no overlap, no confusion.
• ✓ Customer self-assessment driven: gap ratings come from your stated posture, not from inferred maturity. The workbook pre-fills your answer alongside each requirement so reviewers see the basis for every gap rating.
• ✓ Live dashboard with formulas + native radar + doughnut charts that auto-refresh as you mark gap rows Done — no regeneration needed to see remediation progress.
• ✓ Tailored to your jurisdiction, industry, organisation size, and risk appetite — every gap rating accounts for your context, not a generic checklist. Designed for review and sign-off by qualified compliance, legal, or governance practitioners.

Ready to generate?

$39 · one-time — answer a 6-question intake (including jurisdiction = INTL), and download your tailored document immediately.

Also available framed for your sector → see industry-specific pages