Employee AI Guidelines for INTL

INTL-specific obligations covered

The output is anchored on the regulations that apply to AI deployments in INTL. The top frameworks cited:

• OECD Recommendation of the Council on AI (OECD AI Principles, 2024 update)international_framework · Voluntary

  Adherent countries and their organisations are expected to implement five value-based AI principles — inclusive growth, human rights, transparency, robustness and safety, and accountability — and to report on implementation through the OECD AI Policy Observatory.

• UN General Assembly Resolution — Seizing the Opportunities of Safe, Secure and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence Systems for Sustainable Development (A/RES/78/265, 21 March 2024)international_resolution · Adopted

  UN member states are encouraged to develop national AI governance frameworks, engage in international cooperation on AI safety and interoperability of governance standards, and ensure AI systems are developed in a manner consistent with international human rights law.

• Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI and Human Rights (CETS No. 225, 2024)international_treaty · Open for ratification

  State parties must implement legislative or other measures to ensure AI system activities respect human rights, establish oversight and remedy mechanisms for AI-related harms, and prohibit or restrict AI activities incompatible with democracy or the rule of law.

• ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS)international_standard · Published

  Organisations implementing ISO 42001 must establish AI governance policies and objectives, define organisational roles for AI accountability, conduct AI impact and risk assessments, and implement operational controls to address AI risks across the full AI system lifecycle.

How the Employee AI Guidelines approaches this

You describe your organisation and the staff roles in scope. The tool produces a plain-English guidelines document written for frontline employees — not for lawyers — covering what AI tools they can use, what they must not do, and how to escalate concerns.

The output is editable so it can be aligned with your induction and mandatory-training materials. It is a drafting aid intended for review by HR, clinical education, or information-governance leads before it reaches staff.

What you get

• ✓ Readable by frontline staff — short sentences, concrete examples, no legal jargon.
• ✓ Role-aware: individual contributors, managers, and technical roles each get guidance written for their context.
• ✓ Includes a printable wallet card summarising the most critical rules for day-to-day reference.
• ✓ Supports a no-blame reporting culture — the escalation process encourages concerns to surface early.

Ready to generate?

$49 · one-time — answer a 6-question intake (including jurisdiction = INTL), and download your tailored document immediately.

Also available framed for your sector → see industry-specific pages