AI Compliance Gap Analyser for CN

CN-specific obligations covered

The output is anchored on the regulations that apply to AI deployments in CN. The top frameworks cited:

• Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL 2021)national_law · In force

  Personal information processors must establish a lawful basis for processing, obtain separate consent for sensitive personal information, conduct personal information protection impact assessments for high-risk processing, and provide opt-out mechanisms for automated decision-making affecting individual rights.

• Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services (CAC, 2023)administrative_regulation · In force

  Generative AI service providers must ensure training data is lawfully sourced, implement content filtering to prevent prohibited outputs, label AI-generated content, and obtain a CAC security assessment before launching public services.

• Provisions on the Management of Algorithmic Recommendations (CAC, 2022)administrative_regulation · In force

  Algorithm recommendation service providers must disclose their use of algorithms to users, provide opt-out options for personalised recommendations, refrain from dynamic pricing that discriminates against existing customers, and prominently label algorithmically distributed content.

• Provisions on the Administration of Deep Synthesis Internet Information Services (CAC, 2022)administrative_regulation · In force

  Deep synthesis service providers must implement real-name registration for users, label all synthetic content with a visible AI-generated marker, prohibit creation of content that impersonates real persons without consent, and retain synthetic content logs for sixty days.

How the AI Compliance Gap Analyser approaches this

You describe your organisation, choose your framework (EU AI Act / NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 / all three), and answer a brief 10-question self-assessment per framework. The tool maps your stated posture against each framework requirement to produce a structured, evidence-based gap analysis ready for your compliance, legal, and governance practitioners.

The Executive Summary Word document is a one-page sign-off artifact — overall scorecard, top 5 priority actions, cross-framework synthesis (when comparing all three), sign-off block. The detailed Excel workbook is the working remediation instrument: per-framework gap sheets with current state, target state, gap severity, priority action, framework citations, owner, effort, and a Status dropdown that drives the live Dashboard. Both are AI-assisted drafting aids intended to accelerate review and remediation by qualified practitioners.

What you get

• ✓ Two artefacts, two jobs: Executive Summary (.docx) for board sign-off, Detailed Workbook (.xlsx) for the working remediation tracking — no overlap, no confusion.
• ✓ Customer self-assessment driven: gap ratings come from your stated posture, not from inferred maturity. The workbook pre-fills your answer alongside each requirement so reviewers see the basis for every gap rating.
• ✓ Live dashboard with formulas + native radar + doughnut charts that auto-refresh as you mark gap rows Done — no regeneration needed to see remediation progress.
• ✓ Tailored to your jurisdiction, industry, organisation size, and risk appetite — every gap rating accounts for your context, not a generic checklist. Designed for review and sign-off by qualified compliance, legal, or governance practitioners.

Ready to generate?

$39 · one-time — answer a 6-question intake (including jurisdiction = CN), and download your tailored document immediately.

Also available framed for your sector → see industry-specific pages