AI Compliance Gap Analyser for CH

CH-specific obligations covered

The output is anchored on the regulations that apply to AI deployments in CH. The top frameworks cited:

• revFADP — Revised Federal Act on Data Protection (revFADP, SR 235.1), in force 1 September 2023legislation · In force

  Article 6 — Principles for data processing • Article 5(c) — Sensitive personal data (includes health, biometric data) • Article 21 — Automated individual decisions (right to request human review) • Article 22 — Data protection impact assessment

• Swiss MedDO — Swiss Medical Devices Ordinance (MedDO, SR 812.213)legislation · In force

  Healthcare — Switzerland uses mutual recognition with EU MDR/IVDR via MRA. Post-2024 CE marking is not automatically valid in Switzerland for new devices.

• FINMA Circular 2023/1 — Operational Risks and Resilience — Banks (RS 2023/1)regulatory_circular · In force

  FINMA-supervised institutions must identify, assess, and manage AI and ML model risks as part of their operational risk framework; maintain independent model validation processes; ensure board-level accountability for technology risks; and demonstrate adequate controls over AI systems used in credit decisions, trading, and customer-facing services.

• Federal Act on Financial Services (FinSA, SR 950.1)federal_legislation · In force

  Financial service providers using AI for client advisory, portfolio management, or investment recommendations must conduct a client suitability and appropriateness assessment, ensure AI-generated advice is explainable to clients, maintain adequate documentation of algorithmic decision logic, and provide clients with a key information document where required.

How the AI Compliance Gap Analyser approaches this

You describe your organisation, choose your framework (EU AI Act / NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 / all three), and answer a brief 10-question self-assessment per framework. The tool maps your stated posture against each framework requirement to produce a structured, evidence-based gap analysis ready for your compliance, legal, and governance practitioners.

The Executive Summary Word document is a one-page sign-off artifact — overall scorecard, top 5 priority actions, cross-framework synthesis (when comparing all three), sign-off block. The detailed Excel workbook is the working remediation instrument: per-framework gap sheets with current state, target state, gap severity, priority action, framework citations, owner, effort, and a Status dropdown that drives the live Dashboard. Both are AI-assisted drafting aids intended to accelerate review and remediation by qualified practitioners.

What you get

• ✓ Two artefacts, two jobs: Executive Summary (.docx) for board sign-off, Detailed Workbook (.xlsx) for the working remediation tracking — no overlap, no confusion.
• ✓ Customer self-assessment driven: gap ratings come from your stated posture, not from inferred maturity. The workbook pre-fills your answer alongside each requirement so reviewers see the basis for every gap rating.
• ✓ Live dashboard with formulas + native radar + doughnut charts that auto-refresh as you mark gap rows Done — no regeneration needed to see remediation progress.
• ✓ Tailored to your jurisdiction, industry, organisation size, and risk appetite — every gap rating accounts for your context, not a generic checklist. Designed for review and sign-off by qualified compliance, legal, or governance practitioners.

Ready to generate?

$39 · one-time — answer a 6-question intake (including jurisdiction = CH), and download your tailored document immediately.

Also available framed for your sector → see industry-specific pages