AI Risk Register for CH

CH-specific obligations covered

The output is anchored on the regulations that apply to AI deployments in CH. The top frameworks cited:

• revFADP — Revised Federal Act on Data Protection (revFADP, SR 235.1), in force 1 September 2023legislation · In force

  Article 6 — Principles for data processing • Article 5(c) — Sensitive personal data (includes health, biometric data) • Article 21 — Automated individual decisions (right to request human review) • Article 22 — Data protection impact assessment

• Swiss MedDO — Swiss Medical Devices Ordinance (MedDO, SR 812.213)legislation · In force

  Healthcare — Switzerland uses mutual recognition with EU MDR/IVDR via MRA. Post-2024 CE marking is not automatically valid in Switzerland for new devices.

• FINMA Circular 2023/1 — Operational Risks and Resilience — Banks (RS 2023/1)regulatory_circular · In force

  FINMA-supervised institutions must identify, assess, and manage AI and ML model risks as part of their operational risk framework; maintain independent model validation processes; ensure board-level accountability for technology risks; and demonstrate adequate controls over AI systems used in credit decisions, trading, and customer-facing services.

• Federal Act on Financial Services (FinSA, SR 950.1)federal_legislation · In force

  Financial service providers using AI for client advisory, portfolio management, or investment recommendations must conduct a client suitability and appropriateness assessment, ensure AI-generated advice is explainable to clients, maintain adequate documentation of algorithmic decision logic, and provide clients with a key information document where required.

How the AI Risk Register approaches this

You select jurisdiction, industry, and risk appetite. The tool produces a register pre-populated with 12 to 18 AI risks relevant to your sector — each already scored on a 5×5 matrix with suggested mitigations.

You receive the same register in both .xlsx and .docx formats: the spreadsheet for live editing and ongoing risk-committee work, and the Word document for paper sign-off and board appendices. Add organisation-specific risks, adjust scores, assign owners, and set review cadence — the starting point is a credible draft, not a blank template.

What you get

• ✓ Arrives as a working spreadsheet — not a PDF — so it fits straight into your risk workflow.
• ✓ Each risk carries the regulatory obligation it maps to, so reviewers can trace the "why" without re-researching.
• ✓ Bias considerations drawn from published evidence relevant to your sector, surfacing failure modes that generic templates miss.
• ✓ Designed to be signed off by a qualified risk owner — the output does not replace that review, it accelerates the drafting stage.

Ready to generate?

$29 · one-time — answer a 6-question intake (including jurisdiction = CH), and download your tailored document immediately.

Also available framed for your sector → see industry-specific pages