AI Compliance Gap Analyser for BR

BR-specific obligations covered

The output is anchored on the regulations that apply to AI deployments in BR. The top frameworks cited:

• Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados — LGPD (Law 13,709/2018)national_law · In force

  Data controllers must establish a lawful basis for all personal data processing, honour data subject rights including the right to request review of decisions made exclusively by automated processing, appoint a DPO, and report data breaches to the ANPD.

• Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Bill (PL 2338/2023 — Senate)proposed_legislation · Proposed

  Providers and operators of high-risk AI systems must conduct impact assessments, ensure transparency and explainability of consequential AI decisions, implement human oversight mechanisms, and register high-risk AI systems with the designated national authority.

• Marco Civil da Internet — Law 12,965/2014national_law · In force

  Internet application providers must preserve connection and application access logs for court-ordered disclosure, refrain from supplying personal data to third parties without consent, and comply with Brazilian judicial orders for user data within specified timeframes.

• BACEN Resolution 4,658/2018 — Cybersecurity Policy for Financial Institutionsregulatory_resolution · In force

  Financial institutions using AI must establish board-approved cybersecurity policies, conduct comprehensive risk assessments of AI suppliers and cloud providers, maintain relevant contracts with security obligations, and report significant cybersecurity incidents to BACEN.

How the AI Compliance Gap Analyser approaches this

You describe your organisation, choose your framework (EU AI Act / NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 / all three), and answer a brief 10-question self-assessment per framework. The tool maps your stated posture against each framework requirement to produce a structured, evidence-based gap analysis ready for your compliance, legal, and governance practitioners.

The Executive Summary Word document is a one-page sign-off artifact — overall scorecard, top 5 priority actions, cross-framework synthesis (when comparing all three), sign-off block. The detailed Excel workbook is the working remediation instrument: per-framework gap sheets with current state, target state, gap severity, priority action, framework citations, owner, effort, and a Status dropdown that drives the live Dashboard. Both are AI-assisted drafting aids intended to accelerate review and remediation by qualified practitioners.

What you get

• ✓ Two artefacts, two jobs: Executive Summary (.docx) for board sign-off, Detailed Workbook (.xlsx) for the working remediation tracking — no overlap, no confusion.
• ✓ Customer self-assessment driven: gap ratings come from your stated posture, not from inferred maturity. The workbook pre-fills your answer alongside each requirement so reviewers see the basis for every gap rating.
• ✓ Live dashboard with formulas + native radar + doughnut charts that auto-refresh as you mark gap rows Done — no regeneration needed to see remediation progress.
• ✓ Tailored to your jurisdiction, industry, organisation size, and risk appetite — every gap rating accounts for your context, not a generic checklist. Designed for review and sign-off by qualified compliance, legal, or governance practitioners.

Ready to generate?

$39 · one-time — answer a 6-question intake (including jurisdiction = BR), and download your tailored document immediately.

Also available framed for your sector → see industry-specific pages